【OG24-777题】Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country‘s stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?_mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

Help

右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
点击右上角的星星图标，所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意：如果你没有做当前题目，你将不可以进入下一题
点击左下角的 Quit或 End Exam 即可退出练习

End Section Review

yes

End Exam

yes

Answer Edit Confirmation

你想更改这个问题的答案吗?

Yes,换答案

No，保留原始答案并回到问题上

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

Country X's recent stock-trading scandal should not diminish investors' confidence in the country‘s stock market. For one thing, the discovery of the scandal confirms that Country X has a strong regulatory system, as the following considerations show. In any stock market, some fraudulent activity is inevitable. If a stock market is well regulated, any significant stock-trading fraud in it will very likely be discovered. This deters potential perpetrators and facilitates improvement in regulatory processes.

In the argument, the portion in boldface plays which of the following roles?

It is the argument’s only conclusion. It is a conclusion for which the argument provides support and which itself is used to support the arguments main conclusion. It is the arguments main conclusion and is supported by another explicitly stated conclusion for which further support is provided. It is an assumption for which no explicit support is provided and is used to support the argument's only conclusion. It is a compound statement containing both the arguments main conclusionand an assumption used to support that conclusion.

正确答案： B

参考解析

提交我的解析

题干翻译
一方面，丑闻的发现证实了X国拥有强大的监管体系，如下考虑所示。在任何股票市场，一些欺诈活动都是不可避免的。如果一个股票市场受到良好监管，那么其中任何重大的股票交易欺诈很可能会被发现。这会威慑潜在的犯罪者，并有助于监管程序的改进。 逻辑链
Scandal discovery → Strong regu system 问题类型
句子作用题 推理过程
文章先提出丑闻发现证实X国有强大监管体系这一观点，接着阐述股票市场的普遍规律（良好监管下欺诈易被发现等）来支持前面的观点。加粗部分是一个中间结论，它既被文章后续内容支持（通过股票市场规律），又用来支持文章隐含的更大结论（即整个监管体系相关论述所指向的关于监管的更宏观结论）。 选项分析
A选项：它不是文章唯一结论，文章还有关于监管体系有效性等隐含结论，所以A错误。 B选项：符合推理过程，它是一个得到支持且用来支持主要结论的结论，正确。 C选项：它不是主要结论，主要结论更宏观，所以C错误。 D选项：它不是假设，而是有依据的结论，所以D错误。 E选项：它不是包含主要结论和假设的复合陈述，所以E错误。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：