【OG24-742题】To reduce waste of raw materials, the government of Sperland is considering requiring household appliances to be broken down for salvage when discarded. To cover the cost of salvage, the government is planning to charge a fee, which would be imposed when the appliance is first sold. Imposing the fee at the time of salvage would reduce waste more effectively, however, because consumers tend to keep old appliances longer if they are faced with a fee for discarding them.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?_mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

Help

右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
点击右上角的星星图标，所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意：如果你没有做当前题目，你将不可以进入下一题
点击左下角的 Quit或 End Exam 即可退出练习

End Section Review

yes

End Exam

yes

Answer Edit Confirmation

你想更改这个问题的答案吗?

Yes,换答案

No，保留原始答案并回到问题上

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

To reduce waste of raw materials, the government of Sperland is considering requiring household appliances to be broken down for salvage when discarded. To cover the cost of salvage, the government is planning to charge a fee, which would be imposed when the appliance is first sold. Imposing the fee at the time of salvage would reduce waste more effectively, however, because consumers tend to keep old appliances longer if they are faced with a fee for discarding them.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Increasing the cost of disposing of an appliance properly increases the incentive to dispose of it improperly. The fee provides manufacturers with no incentive to produce appliances that are more durable. For people who have bought new appliances recently, the salvage fee would not need to be paid for a number of years. People who sell their used, working appliances to others would not need to pay the salvage fee. Many nonfunctioning appliances that are currently discarded could be repaired at relatively little expense.

正确答案： A

参考解析

提交我的解析

题干翻译
废弃家电会被拆解回收。为覆盖回收成本，政府计划在首次销售时收费。然而，在回收时收费能更有效地减少浪费，因为消费者若面临丢弃收费，会更久保留旧家电。 逻辑链
回收时收费→减少浪费 问题类型
削弱题 推理过程
论点是回收时收费能更有效减少浪费，论据是消费者面临丢弃收费会更久保留旧家电。需要找到能说明回收时收费不能有效减少浪费的选项。 选项分析
A选项：增加正确处理家电的成本会增加不当处理的动机。这意味着回收时收费会导致更多人不当处理家电，不但不能减少浪费，反而可能增加浪费，有力地削弱了论点，当选。 B选项：收费对制造商生产更耐用家电的激励情况，与回收时收费能否减少浪费无关，排除。 C选项：近期购买新家电者不用马上付回收费，未涉及对减少浪费的影响，排除。 D选项：出售二手正常工作家电者不用付回收费，和整体减少浪费的效果无关，排除。 E选项：很多废弃的非功能家电可低成本修复，与回收时收费能否减少浪费没有直接联系，排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：