【OG24-664题】The air quality board recently informed Coffee Roast, a small coffee roasting firm, of a complaint regarding the smoke from its roaster. Recently enacted air quality regulations require machines roasting more than 1 0 pounds of coffee to be equipped with expensive smoke dissipating afterburners. The firm, however, roasts only 8 pounds of coffee at a time. Nevertheless, the company has decided to purchase and install an afterburner. Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the firm’s decision?_mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

Help

右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
点击右上角的星星图标，所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意：如果你没有做当前题目，你将不可以进入下一题
点击左下角的 Quit或 End Exam 即可退出练习

End Section Review

yes

End Exam

yes

Answer Edit Confirmation

你想更改这个问题的答案吗?

Yes,换答案

No，保留原始答案并回到问题上

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

The air quality board recently informed Coffee Roast, a small coffee roasting firm, of a complaint regarding the smoke from its roaster. Recently enacted air quality regulations require machines roasting more than 1 0 pounds of coffee to be equipped with expensive smoke dissipating afterburners. The firm, however, roasts only 8 pounds of coffee at a time. Nevertheless, the company has decided to purchase and install an afterburner.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the firm’s decision?

Until settling on the new air quality regulations, the board had debated whether to require afterburners for machines roasting more than 5 pounds of coffee at a time. Coffee roasted in a machine equipped with an afterburner has its flavor subtly altered. The cost to the firm of an afterburner is less than the cost of replacing its roaster with a smaller one. Fewer complaints are reported in areas that maintain strict rules regarding afterburners. The firm has reason to fear that negative publicity regarding the complaints could result in lost sales,

正确答案： E

参考解析

提交我的解析

题干翻译
一家公司的烘焙机冒烟。最近实施的空气质量法规要求烘焙超过10磅咖啡的机器配备昂贵的消烟后燃器。然而，该公司一次只烘焙8磅咖啡。尽管如此，公司决定购买并安装后燃器。 逻辑链
一次烘8磅→仍买后燃器 问题类型
增强题。需要找到能支持公司决定购买并安装后燃器这一行为的选项。 推理过程
公司目前烘焙量未达法规强制要求却做出购买安装的决定，需要一个合理原因来解释其背后动机，可能是出于其他非法规强制的利益考量。 选项分析
A选项：在确定新法规之前董事会对后燃器要求的讨论，与公司现在为何决定购买安装后燃器无关，无法增强，排除。 B选项：配备后燃器的机器烘焙的咖啡风味有细微改变，这不是公司决定购买安装的有力理由，甚至可能是负面因素，无法增强，排除。 C选项：后燃器成本比更换更小的烘焙机成本低，但未说明公司有更换烘焙机的需求，不能有力支持购买安装决定，排除。 D选项：有严格后燃器规定的地区投诉较少，但不确定公司所在地区情况以及投诉少与公司购买安装的直接关联，无法增强，排除。 E选项：公司担心有关投诉的负面宣传会导致销售损失，所以即使法规不强制也决定购买安装后燃器，很好地解释了公司行为，能够增强，当选。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：