【OG24-638题】A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax to give people an incentive to drive less, reducing traffic congestion in the long term. However, skeptics point out that most people in the province live in areas where cars are the only viable transportation to jobs and stores and therefore cannot greatly change their driving habits in response to higher gasoline prices.In light of the skeptics’ objection, which of the following, if true, would most logically support the prediction that the government’s plan will achieve its goal of reducing traffic congestion?_mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

Help

右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
点击右上角的星星图标，所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意：如果你没有做当前题目，你将不可以进入下一题
点击左下角的 Quit或 End Exam 即可退出练习

End Section Review

yes

End Exam

yes

Answer Edit Confirmation

你想更改这个问题的答案吗?

Yes,换答案

No，保留原始答案并回到问题上

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

A provincial government plans to raise the gasoline tax to give people an incentive to drive less, reducing traffic congestion in the long term. However, skeptics point out that most people in the province live in areas where cars are the only viable transportation to jobs and stores and therefore cannot greatly change their driving habits in response to higher gasoline prices.

In light of the skeptics’ objection, which of the following, if true, would most logically support the prediction that the government’s plan will achieve its goal of reducing traffic congestion?

The revenue from the tax will be used to make public transportation a viable means of transportation to jobs and stores for far more people. The tax will encourage many residents to switch to more fuel-efficient cars, reducing air pollution and other problems. Because gasoline has been underpriced for decades, the province has many neighborhoods where cars are the only viable means of transportation. Most residents who cannot greatly change their driving habits could compensate for high gasoline prices by reducing other expenses. Traffic congestion is an especially serious problem for people for whom cars are the only viable means of transportation.

正确答案： A

参考解析

提交我的解析

题干翻译
政府计划通过提高汽油税减少交通拥堵，但怀疑者指出该省大多数人居住在汽车是前往工作和商店的唯一可行交通方式的地区，因此不会因汽油价格上涨而大幅改变驾驶习惯。 逻辑链
提高汽油税→减拥堵（怀疑者反对） 问题类型
增强题 推理过程
怀疑者认为因为人们依赖汽车，所以提高汽油税无法减少拥堵。要支持政府计划能达成目标，需找到能让人们减少开车的因素。 选项分析
A选项：税收收入将用于让更多人能使用公共交通前往工作和商店。这为人们提供了除开车之外的可行交通方式，有可能让人们减少开车，从而支持了政府计划能减少拥堵，当选。 B选项：提到鼓励居民换更省油的车以减少污染等问题，未涉及能否减少交通拥堵，与论点无关，排除。 C选项：只是在说该省很多地区汽车是唯一可行交通方式，加强了怀疑者的观点，而不是支持政府计划，排除。 D选项：说居民可通过减少其他开支应对高油价，和能否减少交通拥堵没有关系，排除。 E选项：指出交通拥堵对依赖汽车的人是严重问题，但没有说明如何解决拥堵，无法支持政府计划，排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：