【OG24-607题】According to the passage, Krontiris’s work differs from that of the scholars mentioned in highlight line in which of the following ways?_mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.

The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.

According to the passage, Krontiris’s work differs from that of the scholars mentioned in highlight line in which of the following ways?

Krontiris’s work stresses the achievements of Renaissance women rather than the obstacles to their success. Krontiris’s work is based on a reinterpretation of the work of earlier scholars. Krontiris’s views are at odds with those of both Kelly and Burkhardt. Krontiris’s work focuses on the place of women in Renaissance society. Krontiris’s views are based exclusively on the study of a privileged group of women.

正确答案： E

参考解析

提交我的解析

文章大意逻辑
文章开篇指出雅各布·布克哈特认为文艺复兴时期欧洲女性与男性地位平等，这一观点常被女权主义学者引用以引出女性不平等的历史证据。与之形成鲜明对比的是，琼·凯利在1977年的文章中认为文艺复兴时期女性在经济和社会方面相对男性及中世纪女性处于衰退状态。然而，最近女权主义学者中出现了一种趋势，既反对凯利的悲观看法，也反对布克哈特的乐观看法，他们强调文艺复兴时期女性之间的差异，使布克哈特和凯利基于上层意大利女性观察所得出的概括变得复杂。这种趋势在关注中上层欧洲女性的作品中也很明显，以蒂娜·克龙提里斯为例，她的研究有时会混淆“女性”和“女性作家”，不过她仍为该领域做出了重要贡献，对文艺复兴时期女性的成就做出了谨慎乐观的评估，同时也强调了障碍。 文章类型及逻辑简图
文章类型为新旧观点对比。 Old views: Burckhardt: Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with men. Kelly: Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women. New trend: Reject both Kelly’s dark vision and Burckhardt’s rosy one, stress differences among Renaissance women. Example Krontiris: Her study has flaws but makes a significant contribution, offers a cautiously optimistic assessment of women’s achievements and stresses obstacles. 做题方法及问题类型
本题为细节题，通过定位关键词“Krontiris”以及题干中提及的高亮部分学者，对比相关信息来解题。 选项分析
A选项：“Krontiris’s work stresses the achievements of Renaissance women rather than the obstacles to their success.” 文章明确提到她既强调成就也强调障碍，并非只强调成就，该选项错误。 B选项：“Krontiris’s work is based on a reinterpretation of the work of earlier scholars.” 文中未提及她的作品是基于对早期学者作品的重新解读，该选项错误。 C选项：“Krontiris’s views are at odds with those of both Kelly and Burckhardt.” 符合文中新趋势既反对凯利也反对布克哈特观点，克龙提里斯是新趋势代表的描述，该选项正确。 D选项：“Krontiris’s work focuses on the place of women in Renaissance society.” 过于宽泛，没有体现出与高亮部分学者观点的差异，该选项错误。 E选项：“Krontiris’s views are based exclusively on the study of a privileged group of women.” 她虽研究中上层女性，但不是唯一依据，且这不是与高亮部分学者观点的主要差异，该选项错误。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：