Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality” with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?” argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.


The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience” in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,” assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.


The author of the passage discusses Krontiris primarily to provide an example of a writer who

正确答案: D

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    文章开篇提到雅各布·布克哈特认为文艺复兴时期欧洲女性与男性地位平等,这一观点常被女权主义学者引用作为阐述女性不平等历史证据的前奏。琼·凯利则持相反观点,认为文艺复兴时期女性相对男性和中世纪女性,经济和社会地位下降。近来许多女权主义学者的作品既拒绝了凯利的悲观看法,也拒绝了布克哈特的乐观看法,强调文艺复兴时期女性间的差异,使布克哈特和凯利基于上层意大利女性观察所做的概括变得复杂。接着指出关注能写作的中上层欧洲女性的作品也存在趋势,以蒂娜·克龙特里丝研究六位文艺复兴女性作家为例,她有时会混淆“女性”和“女性作家”,但她仍对该领域有重要贡献,是持谨慎乐观态度的作者代表。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型:新旧观点对比 逻辑简图 Burckhardt's view: Renaissance women = Renaissance men (equality) cited by feminist scholars Kelly's view: Renaissance was a decline for women opposite to Burckhardt Recent trend among feminist scholars: reject both Kelly's and Burckhardt's views Focus on middle and upper class European women writers: Krontris as an example sometimes conflate "women" and "women writers", but makes contribution 做题方法及问题类型
    这是一道细节目的题,通过定位文中“Tina Krontris, for example”相关内容来判断作者讨论克龙特里丝的主要目的。 选项分析
    A选项:文中未提及克龙特里丝高度批判某些文艺复兴女性的作品,属于无中生有,排除。 B选项:她并非支持凯利对文艺复兴时期女性地位的观点,与原文不符,排除。 C选项:文中没有说她误解了某些文艺复兴女性的作品,排除。 D选项:根据文中内容,近来许多学者拒绝布克哈特和凯利的观点,克龙特里丝作为例子,符合这一趋势,该选项正确。 E选项:文中只说她研究六位文艺复兴女性作家,未提及广泛的社会和宗教背景,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈