Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world’s endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this “amphibian crisis,” which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.


The primary purpose of the passage is to

正确答案: A

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    文章开篇指出近期有报告称两栖动物数量大幅下降和一些濒危物种灭绝,许多环保主义者认为这是“两栖动物危机”,是人类活动导致环境恶化的标志,需要立即采取环保行动。接着作者为评估这些说法,强调区分数量下降群体和濒危群体很重要,说明了两者不同特点。然后提到生物学家认为数量下降比物种灭绝更令人担忧,且数量下降情况多样,而轶事报告无法区分这些可能性,最后指出目前缺乏长期科学数据来让研究人员进行评估。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型为观点评估型。 逻辑简图: 1. Reports of amphibian population declines and extinctions. Many environmentalists claim it's an "amphibian crisis" due to human caused environmental degradation and call for immediate action. 2. Need to distinguish declining and endangered populations. 3. For biologists, population declines are more worrisome, with different types of declines. Anecdotal reports can't distinguish. 4. Lack of long term scientific data for evaluation. 问题类型及做题方法
    问题类型为主旨题,做题方法是通过梳理文章整体内容,把握作者围绕两栖动物数量下降这一现象所展开的讨论重点和目的。 选项分析
    A. assess the validity of a certain view:文章主要围绕环保主义者关于“两栖动物危机”及人类活动导致环境恶化这一观点,进行了区分概念、分析情况以及指出数据不足等评估,该项符合文章主旨,正确。 B. distinguish between two phenomena:区分数量下降群体和濒危群体只是文章评估观点过程中的一部分内容,不是主要目的,排除。 C. identify the causes of a problem:文章重点不是确定两栖动物数量下降这一问题的原因,而是对相关观点进行评估,排除。 D. describe a disturbing trend:描述趋势只是开头引入内容,文章重点并非单纯描述,排除。 E. allay concern about a particular phenomenon:文章并没有缓解对两栖动物数量下降这一现象的担忧,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈