Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world’s endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this “amphibian crisis,” which, in

their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.


It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following to be true of the environmentalists mentioned in highlight lines ?

正确答案: D

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    最近有报告显示两栖动物数量大幅下降以及一些濒危物种灭绝。许多环保主义者认为这是“两栖动物危机”,表明环境退化严重,需立即采取行动。但要评估这些说法,需区分数量下降和濒危,数量下降不一定意味着濒危,且偶然事件也可能影响物种灭绝概率。对生物学家来说,数量持续下降更值得担忧,但也要区分是正常波动还是威胁到灭绝的下降。目前缺乏足够长期数据,轶事报告无法区分这些情况。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型为观点评价型。 逻辑简图: 1. Reports of amphibian population declines and extinctions. Environmentalists claim "amphibian crisis" and call for immediate action. 2. Need to distinguish declining population from endangered one. Chance events affect extinction probability. 3. Population declines more worrisome for biologists, but need to distinguish types of declines. Anecdotal reports are insufficient. 4. Lack of long term data. 做题方法及问题类型
    这是一道推断题,通过定位到文中对环保主义者观点描述及作者评价的相关内容进行推断。 选项分析
    A选项:文中未提及环保主义者关注轶事报告而非长期数据,属于无中生有,排除。 B选项:文中没有说他们的研究聚焦范围太窄,排除。 C选项:文中作者主要批判的是他们根据近期报告就得出存在危机的结论过早,而非对数量下降原因判断的确定性问题,排除。 D选项:从文中可知作者认为目前数据不足,环保主义者根据近期报告就得出两栖动物存在危机的结论是过早的,该项正确。 E选项:文中没有提到他们高估偶然事件对两栖动物种群趋势的影响,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈