【OG24-561题】The author of the passage mentions the supervision of schools primarily in order to _mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women.Buel and Buel’s biography of Mary Fish (1736–1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock’s deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.

The author of the passage mentions the supervision of schools primarily in order to

remind readers of the role education played in the cultural changes of the nineteenth century in the United States suggest an area in which nineteenth-century American women were relatively free to exercise power provide an example of an occupation for which accurate data about women’s participation are difficult to obtain speculate about which occupations were considered suitable for United States women of the nineteenth century illustrate how the answers to questions about women’s status depend on particular contexts

正确答案： E

参考解析

提交我的解析

文章大意逻辑
文章开篇指出1984年出版的两部作品在书写美国女性历史方面方法截然不同。Buel的传记没怎么将Mary Fish的故事置于近期女性史学背景中；Lebsock不仅书写南方社区女性历史，还重新引导了关于19世纪女性地位变化的史学辩论。虽然两本书都能让读者评估女性地位争议，但只有Lebsock的书直接处理了该争议。她研究了女性地位的多个方面，得出结论：女性在私人领域获得自主权，但在经济领域失去了权力；而且女性地位的变化取决于参照框架。比如，像监督学校这类工作被男性接管，女性相对男性失去权力，但相比之前自身地位也有权力提升，如拥有更高比例房地产。相比之下，Buel的传记提供了大量质疑18世纪殖民黄金时代神话的原始材料，但在分析女性地位争议方面没给读者太多指导。 文章类型及逻辑简图
文章类型：对比型。逻辑简图： Two works in 1984 show contrasting approaches to US women's history Buel's biography of Mary Fish: little effort in context Lebsock's work: write women's history in a southern community & redirect historiographical debate Only Lebsock deals with women's status controversy directly Women's status: gained in private sphere, lost in economic sphere; depends on frame of reference (e.g., supervising schools taken over by men, but more real estate ownership) Buel's biography: offers raw material for questioning myth, little guidance in analyzing controversy 做题方法及问题类型
问题类型：目的题。做题方法：通过定位文中“supervising schools”所在句子，分析其在文中的作用来解题。 选项分析
A选项：文章提到监督学校并非为了提醒读者教育在19世纪美国文化变革中的作用，无中生有，排除。 B选项：文中未提及19世纪美国女性在监督学校方面相对自由地行使权力，属于无依据内容，排除。 C选项：文章没有说提到监督学校是为了举例说明难以获取女性参与该职业的准确数据，排除。 D选项：文中不是在推测哪些职业适合19世纪美国女性，排除。 E选项：文中说“Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men.”，以监督学校工作被男性接管为例，说明了女性地位的答案取决于特定背景，该选项符合文意，当选。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：