Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

Arboria is floundering in the global marketplace, incurring devastating losses in market position and profits. The problem is not Arboria's products, but Arboria's trade policy. Arboria faces the prospect of continuing economic loss until Arborian business and political leaders recognize the fundamental differences between Arborian and foreign economic systems. Today the key trade issue is not free trade versus protectionism but diminishing trade versus expanding trade.


Arboria is operating with an obsolete trade policy, an artifact of the mid-1940s when Arboria and Whorfland dominated the global economy, tariffs were the principal obstacle to trade, and Arborian supremacy was uncontested in virtually all industries. In the intervening decades, economic circumstances have shifted radically. Arborian trade policy has not.


Today, Arboria's trade policy seems paralyzed by the relentless conflict between proponents of “free” and “fair” trade. The free traders argue that Arborian markets should be open, and the movement of goods and services across national borders unrestrained. The fair traders assert that access to Arborian markets should be restricted until Arborian businesses are granted equal access to foreign markets. They contend that free trade is impossible while other nations erect barriers to Arborian exports.


Both are correct: fair trade requires equal access and equal access leads to free trade. But both sides base their positions on the same two outdated premises:

1. Global commerce is conducted under the terms of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and dominated by Arboria and similar economic systems abroad.

2. Multilateral negotiations are the most effective way to resolve pressing trade issues.


Both assumptions are wrong. The 40-year-old GATT now covers less than 7 percent of global commerce. World trade is no longer dominated by the free-trade economies; nearly 75 percent is conducted by economic systems operating with principles at odds with those of Arboria. Forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible. And while multilateral talks drag on, Arboria misses opportunities for trade expansion.


The author implies that the main obstacle to a truly effective Arborian trade policy is the


正确答案: B

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    Arboria在全球市场表现糟糕,问题出在贸易政策而非产品。其贸易政策陈旧,源于20世纪40年代中期。如今其贸易政策受“自由贸易”和“公平贸易”支持者冲突的影响。双方虽都有道理,但基于两个过时前提。Arboria需让商业和政治领袖认识到本国与外国经济体系的根本差异,否则经济损失可能持续。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型:问题 分析型 逻辑简图: 1. Arboria's problem: floundering in global market due to trade policy 2. Outdated trade policy origin: mid 1940s 3. Current situation: paralyzed by free fair trade conflict 4. Underlying issue: both sides based on outdated premises 5. Solution hint: leaders recognize economic system differences 做题方法及问题类型
    这是一道推断题,通过定位文中“Arborian business and political leaders recognize the fundamental differences between Arborian and foreign economic systems”等相关表述来推断答案。 选项分析
    A选项:Arboria目前在全球市场的弱势地位。文章强调的是贸易政策问题,而非当前市场地位本身是主要障碍,A错误。 B选项:Arborian领导人无法认识到外国经济体系基于与本国根本不同的原则。符合文章中提到的只有领导人认识到差异才能解决问题,所以这是有效贸易政策的主要障碍,B正确。 C选项:自由贸易支持者在自由贸易和公平贸易倡导者冲突中的主导地位。文章重点不是某一方的主导地位,而是双方基于的前提过时,C错误。 D选项:Arborian工业似乎无法生产在世界市场上有竞争力的商品。文章开头就表明问题不是产品,而是贸易政策,D错误。 E选项:Arboria许多贸易伙伴的贸易政策中的保护主义特征。这不是主要障碍,主要障碍是本国领导人的认识问题,E错误。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈