Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

Arboria is floundering in the global marketplace, incurring devastating losses in market position and profits. The problem is not Arboria's products, but Arboria's trade policy. Arboria faces the prospect of continuing economic loss until Arborian business and political leaders recognize the fundamental differences between Arborian and foreign economic systems. Today the key trade issue is not free trade versus protectionism but diminishing trade versus expanding trade.


Arboria is operating with an obsolete trade policy, an artifact of the mid-1940s when Arboria and Whorfland dominated the global economy, tariffs were the principal obstacle to trade, and Arborian supremacy was uncontested in virtually all industries. In the intervening decades, economic circumstances have shifted radically. Arborian trade policy has not.


Today, Arboria's trade policy seems paralyzed by the relentless conflict between proponents of “free” and “fair” trade. The free traders argue that Arborian markets should be open, and the movement of goods and services across national borders unrestrained. The fair traders assert that access to Arborian markets should be restricted until Arborian businesses are granted equal access to foreign markets. They contend that free trade is impossible while other nations erect barriers to Arborian exports.


Both are correct: fair trade requires equal access and equal access leads to free trade. But both sides base their positions on the same two outdated premises:

1. Global commerce is conducted under the terms of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and dominated by Arboria and similar economic systems abroad.

2. Multilateral negotiations are the most effective way to resolve pressing trade issues.


Both assumptions are wrong. The 40-year-old GATT now covers less than 7 percent of global commerce. World trade is no longer dominated by the free-trade economies; nearly 75 percent is conducted by economic systems operating with principles at odds with those of Arboria. Forging a multilateral trade policy consensus among so many diverse economic systems has become virtually impossible. And while multilateral talks drag on, Arboria misses opportunities for trade expansion.


Which of the following statements best summarizes the author's opinion of “free traders” and “fair traders”?


正确答案: E

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    Arboria在全球市场陷入困境,问题出在贸易政策而非产品。其贸易政策过时,源于20世纪40年代中期。如今“自由贸易者”和“公平贸易者”争论不休,前者主张开放市场,后者认为应在获得平等进入外国市场机会后才开放。作者指出双方都正确,但立场基于两个过时前提文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型:问题分析型 逻辑简图 Arboria's problem: floundering in global market due to trade policy Outdated trade policy: from mid 1940s Debate between free and fair traders Free traders: open markets Fair traders: restricted access until equal access is granted Author's view: both are right but based on outdated premises 做题方法及问题类型
    本题为观点总结题,需通过定位到文中关于作者对“自由贸易者”和“公平贸易者”观点的描述语句(“Both are correct... But both sides base their positions on the same two outdated premises”)来解题。 选项分析
    A选项:自由贸易者和公平贸易者的持续辩论为审查Arborian贸易政策提供了健康有效的论坛。文中未提及辩论是健康有效的,属于无中生有,排除。 B选项:公平贸易的支持者基本正确,而倡导自由贸易的人不正确。作者认为双方都有正确之处,并非一方正确一方错误,排除。 C选项:自由贸易的支持者比公平贸易者更能应对当前经济问题。文中没有将两者应对经济问题的能力进行比较,排除。 D选项:自由贸易者和公平贸易者都无法提出可行的贸易政策,因为两者都没有考虑多边谈判。文中未提及多边谈判相关内容,排除。 E选项:自由贸易和公平贸易的支持者都基于不能反映当前经济状况的过时前提来确立他们的立场。符合文中作者观点,当选。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈