Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

There are recent reports of apparently drastic declines in amphibian populations and of extinctions of a number of the world’s endangered amphibian species. These declines, if real, may be signs of a general trend toward extinction, and many environmentalists have claimed that immediate environmental action is necessary to remedy this “amphibian crisis,” which, in their view, is an indicator of general and catastrophic environmental degradation due to human activity.

To evaluate these claims, it is useful to make a preliminary distinction that is far too often ignored. A declining population should not be confused with an endangered one. An endangered population is always rare, almost always small, and, by definition, under constant threat of extinction even without a proximate cause in human activities. Its disappearance, however unfortunate, should come as no great surprise. Moreover, chance events—which may indicate nothing about the direction of trends in population size—may lead to its extinction. The probability of extinction due to such random factors depends on the population size and is independent of the prevailing direction of change in that size.

For biologists, population declines are potentially more worrisome than extinctions. Persistent declines, especially in large populations, indicate a changed ecological context. Even here, distinctions must again be made among declines that are only apparent (in the sense that they are part of habitual cycles or of normal fluctuations), declines that take a population to some lower but still acceptable level, and those that threaten extinction (e.g., by taking the number of individuals below the minimum viable population). Anecdotal reports of population decreases cannot distinguish among these possibilities, and some amphibian populations have shown strong fluctuations in the past.

It is indisputably true that there is simply not enough long-term scientific data on amphibian populations to enable researchers to identify real declines in amphibian populations. Many fairly common amphibian species declared all but extinct after severe declines in the 1950s and 1960s have subsequently recovered, and so might the apparently declining populations that have generated the current appearance of an amphibian crisis. Unfortunately, longterm data will not soon be forthcoming, and postponing environmental action while we wait for it may doom species and whole ecosystems to extinction.


Which of the following best describes the function of the sentence in highlight lines ?

正确答案: C

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    文章开篇指出近期有报告称两栖动物数量大幅下降及部分濒危物种灭绝,许多环保主义者认为这是 “两栖动物危机”,需立即采取环境行动,因为这暗示了整体环境恶化。接着提出要评估这些说法,需先区分数量下降的种群和濒危种群:濒危种群稀少、规模小且常面临灭绝威胁;数量下降对生物学家来说比物种灭绝更令人担忧,因为持续下降尤其是大规模种群的下降暗示生态环境改变,同时数量下降又分为多种情况,如属于正常波动、降至可接受水平或威胁到灭绝等。但目前缺乏足够长期科学数据。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型:观点论证型。 逻辑简图: Recent reports: drastic declines in amphibian populations and extinctions of endangered species → Environmentalists claim: immediate environmental action needed for “amphibian crisis” To evaluate: distinguish declining population from endangered one Endangered: rare, small, under constant threat Population declines: more worrisome for biologists, with different types of declines Problem: not enough long term scientific data 做题方法及问题类型
    问题类型:句子功能题。做题方法:通过定位高亮句子,分析其在文中上下文的逻辑关系来判断功能。 选项分析
    A选项:“To give an example of a particular kind of study”(给出一种特定研究的例子)。高亮句子并非是在举例某种研究,与原文逻辑不符,排除。 B选项:“To cast doubt on an assertion made in the previous sentence”(对前一句所做的断言表示怀疑)。前一句主要说的是濒危种群的特点,高亮句子不是在怀疑这个,排除。 C选项:“To raise an objection to a view presented in the first paragraph”(对第一段提出的观点提出异议)。第一段环保主义者认为两栖动物数量下降是危机需要立即行动,而高亮句子所在段落指出要区分不同情况且数据不足,是对第一段观点的异议,该选项正确。 D选项:“To provide support for a view presented in the first paragraph”(为第一段提出的观点提供支持)。实际是在反驳第一段观点而非支持,排除。 E选项:“To introduce an idea that will be countered in the following paragraph”(引入一个将在接下来段落中被反驳的观点)。后续段落没有反驳此句相关观点,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈