Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

In recent years, Western business managers have been heeding the exhortations of business journalists and academics to move their companies toward long‐term, collaborative “strategic partnerships” with their external business partners (e.g., suppliers). The experts’ advice comes as a natural reaction to numerous studies conducted during the past decade that compared Japanese production and supply practices with those of the rest of the world. The link between the success of a certain well-known Japanese automaker and its effective management of its suppliers, for example, has led to an unquestioning belief within Western management circles in the value of strategic partnerships. Indeed, in the automobile sector all three United States manufacturers and most of their European competitors have launched programs to reduce their total number of suppliers and move toward having strategic partnerships with a few.


However, new research concerning supplier relationships in various industries demonstrates that the widespread assumption of Western managers and business consultants that Japanese firms manage their suppliers primarily through strategic partnerships is unjustified. Not only do Japanese firms appear to conduct a far smaller proportion of their business through strategic partnerships than is commonly believed, but they also make extensive use of “market-exchange” relationships, in which either party can turn to the marketplace and shift to different business partners at will, a practice usually associated with Western manufacturers.


Which of the following is cited in the passage as evidence supporting the author's claim about what the new research referred to in highlighted text demonstrates?

正确答案: D

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    近年来,西方企业管理者听从专家建议,推动公司与外部商业伙伴建立长期合作的“战略伙伴关系”,这源于过去十年大量研究对比日本与世界其他地区生产和供应实践,日本汽车制造商成功与供应商有效管理的关联,让西方管理界坚信战略伙伴关系价值。然而,新研究表明西方管理者和商业顾问普遍认为日本企业主要通过战略伙伴关系管理供应商的假设不合理,日本企业通过战略伙伴关系开展业务比例比通常认为的小,还广泛使用“市场交换”关系。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型:新旧观点对比 逻辑简图 Old view: Western managers believe Japanese firms manage suppliers mainly through strategic partnerships due to studies on Japanese production success link with supplier management. (西方管理者因研究认为日本企业主要通过战略伙伴关系管理供应商) New view: New research shows this assumption is unjustified, Japanese firms use strategic partnerships less and market exchange relationships more. (新研究表明此假设不合理,日本企业战略伙伴关系使用少,市场交换关系使用多) 做题方法及问题类型
    问题类型:细节题 做题方法:根据问题中“new research”的提示,定位到文中“However, new research...”所在段落,寻找支持作者关于新研究主张的证据。 选项分析
    A选项:西方管理界对日本企业依赖战略伙伴关系程度的看法,这是旧观点内容,不是新研究的证据,排除。 B选项:欧美企业与供应商建立战略伙伴关系的数量,与新研究关于日本企业和供应商关系的内容无关,排除。 C选项:西方汽车制造商对采用战略伙伴关系建议的回应,与新研究对日本企业和供应商关系的结论不相关,排除。 D选项:日本企业和供应商之间“市场交换”关系的普遍存在,符合新研究中提到日本企业广泛使用“市场交换”关系这一主张,是新研究结论的证据,当选。 E选项:某日本汽车制造商青睐与供应商建立战略伙伴关系的成功案例,支持的是旧观点,而非新研究结论,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈