【OG24-564题】The passage suggests that Lebsock believes that compared to nineteenth-century American women, eighteenth-century American women were _mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women.Buel and Buel biography of Mary Fish (1736 1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women status.

The passage suggests that Lebsock believes that compared to nineteenth-century American women, eighteenth-century American women were

in many respects less powerful in relation to men more likely to own real estate generally more economically independent more independent in conducting their private lives less likely to work as school superintendents

正确答案： C

参考解析

提交我的解析

文章大意逻辑
文章开篇指出1984年出版的两部作品在书写美国女性历史上方法形成对比。Buel和Buel对Mary Fish的传记几乎没将其故事置于近期女性史学背景中；而Lebsock不仅书写了南方一个社区女性的历史，还重新引导了关于19世纪与18世纪相比女性地位得失的史学辩论。接着详细阐述Lebsock的研究，她通过多方面分析女性地位，得出女性在一些领域（尤其私人领域）获得自主权，但在经济领域许多方面失去自主权的结论，还表明辩论取决于参考框架。最后指出Buel和Buel的传记提供了质疑18世纪殖民黄金时代神话的原始材料，但在分析女性地位争议上没给读者太多指引。 文章类型及逻辑简图
文章类型为对比型。逻辑简图： Introduction：Two works in 1984 show contrasting approaches to writing US women's history Buel and Buel's biography of Mary Fish vs Lebsock's work Lebsock's work：Write women's history in a southern community, redirect historiographical debate, examine women's status in different aspects, conclude women's autonomy gains and losses, show debate depends on frame reference Buel and Buel's work：Provide raw material for questioning myth, offer little guidance in analyzing women status controversy 问题类型及做题方法
这是一道推断题，通过定位文中关于Lebsock对18世纪和19世纪美国女性看法的相关表述来进行推断。定位提示句子为“She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example.” 选项分析
A选项：文中未提及在与男性关系上18世纪女性在很多方面比19世纪女性更弱势，排除。 B选项：文中说的是19世纪女性拥有更高比例房地产，而非18世纪，排除。 C选项：从“they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere”等表述可推断出18世纪女性在经济上总体更独立，当选。 D选项：文中未就18世纪和19世纪女性在私人生活独立性上进行比较，排除。 E选项：文中未提及18世纪和19世纪女性担任学校督学的可能性差异，排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：