【OG24-563题】According to the passage, Lebsock’s work differs from Buel and Buel’s work in that Lebsock’s work _mofa留学圈mofaGRE在线题库系统_GRE在线搜题_GRE题库解析_GRE真题机经_GRE课程_GRE培训机构

最新题目

题目内容

纠错

Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women.Buel and Buel’s biography of Mary Fish (1736–1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status in the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock’s deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.

According to the passage, Lebsock’s work differs from Buel and Buel’s work in that Lebsock’s work

uses a large number of primary sources ignores issues of women’s legal status refuses to take a position on women’s status in the eighteenth century addresses larger historiographical issues fails to provide sufficient material to support its claims

正确答案： D

参考解析

提交我的解析

文章大意逻辑
文章开篇指出1984年出版的两部作品在书写美国女性历史方面方法形成对比。Buel和Buel的作品对将人物故事置于近期女性史学背景下没怎么努力，其传记提供了大量原始材料质疑殖民黄金时代的神话，但在分析女性地位争议上没给读者太多指导。Lebsock的作品不仅试图书写南方社区女性历史，还重新引导了关于19世纪女性地位变化的史学辩论，且直接处理了女性地位争议问题，从多方面考察女性地位，得出女性在某些方面获得自主、在经济领域某些方面失去地位的结论，同时表明争议本身取决于参照系。 文章类型及逻辑简图
文章类型为新旧观点对比（这里是两种不同作品方法的对比）。逻辑简图： Two works in 1984: contrasting approaches to US women's history writing Buel and Buel's work: little effort in context lots of raw material for questioning myth, little guidance in analyzing controversy Lebsock's work: write women's history in southern community + redirect historiographical debate directly deal with women's status controversy, examine aspects of women's status, draw conclusion 做题方法及问题类型
这是一道细节题，通过定位关键词“Lebsock’s work differs from Buel and Buel’s work in that”，在文中找到关于两者对比的描述来解题。 选项分析
A选项：文中未提及Lebsock的作品使用大量一手资料，属于无中生有，排除。 B选项：文中没有说Lebsock的作品忽视女性法律地位问题，排除。 C选项：Lebsock的作品是处理了19世纪女性地位变化的辩论，不是拒绝就18世纪女性地位表态，排除。 D选项：Lebsock的作品试图重新引导史学辩论，处理女性地位争议等，确实处理了更大的史学问题，符合文意，当选。 E选项：文中未提及Lebsock的作品未能提供足够材料支持其主张，排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

做题笔记

参考解析

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑，欢迎在这里提出来，大家会帮你解答的哦~)

请选择错误类型：

请描述一下这个错误：