Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错

In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are directly related to end products. With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production, corporations often favor “supplier partnerships” (arrangements in which the purchaser forgoes the right to pursue alternative suppliers), which can inappropriately shelter suppliers from rigorous competitive scrutiny that might afford the purchaser economic leverage. There are two independent variables‐availability of alternatives and ease of changing suppliers‐that companies should use to evaluate the feasibility of subjecting suppliers of indirect purchases to competitive scrutiny. This can create four possible situations.


In Type 1 situations, there are many alternatives and change is relatively easy. Open pursuit of alternatives‐by frequent competitive bidding, if possible—will likely yield the best results. In Type 2 situations, where there are many alternatives but change is difficult—as for providers of employee health-care benefits—it is important to continuously test the market and use the results to secure concessions from existing suppliers. Alternatives provide a credible threat to suppliers, even if the ability to switch is constrained. In Type 3 situations, there are few alternatives, but the ability to switch without difficulty creates a threat that companies can use to negotiate concessions from existing suppliers. In Type 4 situations, where there are few alternatives and change is difficult, partnerships may be unavoidable.


According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?

正确答案: D

参考解析

提交我的解析
    文章大意逻辑
    文章开头指出企业采购中,对与终端产品直接相关物品的供应商通常进行竞争审查,而对于“间接”采购(如计算机、广告、法律服务等与生产不直接相关的采购),企业常倾向“供应商合作伙伴关系”,但这可能不当保护供应商。接着提出有两个独立变量(替代品的可用性和更换供应商的难易程度)可用于评估对间接采购供应商进行竞争审查的可行性,并由此创造出四种可能情况,随后分别阐述了这四种情况。 文章类型及逻辑简图
    文章类型为总分结构。 逻辑简图: 总述:In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny for direct related suppliers, "supplier partnerships" for indirect purchases, two variables to evaluate competitive scrutiny for indirect suppliers 分述 Type 1: many alternatives, easy change Type 2: many alternatives, difficult change Type 3: few alternatives, easy change Type 4: few alternatives, difficult change 做题方法及问题类型
    这是一道细节题,通过定位文中对“indirect purchase”(间接采购)的定义描述句子来解题,定位提示为第一段中“‘indirect’ purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production” 。 选项分析
    A选项:采购公司对所购物品潜在供应商进行竞争审查的能力。文中重点并非在采购公司审查能力区分间接采购,而是间接采购与生产的关系,该选项不符合,排除。 B选项:采购公司可获得的所购物品供应商数量。数量并非区分间接采购的关键,排除。 C选项:采购公司可用的谈判方法。谈判方法与区分间接采购无关,排除。 D选项:所购物品与采购公司终端产品的关系。符合文中对间接采购“not directly related to production”(与生产不直接相关)的定义,当选。 E选项:所购物品在采购公司业务运营中的重要程度。重要程度不是区分间接采购的依据,排除。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈