Help

  • 右上角的时钟图标会对每道题和所有题计时
  • 右上角的文件夹点击可以打开和关闭当前题号
  • 点击右上角的星星图标 ,所有被收藏的题目均可在“我的”-“收藏”中找到
  • 点击右下角 Next进入下一题。注意:如果你没有做当前题目,你将不可以进入下一题
  • 点击左下角的 QuitEnd Exam 即可退出练习

Close

End Section Review

    你想结束这部分的检查吗?
    如果你点击Yes,你将结束该部分模考。
yes
no

End Exam

    You are about to end your exam

    If you click the Yes button below,your exam will end.
    Are you sure you want to end your exam?
yes
no

Answer Edit Confirmation

    你想更改这个问题的答案吗?
Yes,换答案
No,保留原始答案并回到问题上
注册 注册限时领GMAT/GRE全科PDF备考资料包

欢迎登陆~

验证码
登录
没有账号? 立即注册

欢迎加入~

验证码
注册
已有账号? 立即登录

找回密码~

验证码
提交
记起密码? 立即登录
提交 取消
最新题目

题目内容

收藏
纠错
  • Software Company
  • Government Response
A bill before Parliament would require all of government to use only open-source software, i.e., software that is nonproprietary, based on code the user is allowed to redistribute and alter in any way. The bill appears to assume that open-source software is free. However, research has shown that the purchase cost of open source software is about 8% of the total cost associated with the use of the software, and that the cost of utilization—the sum of all non-purchase costs including installation, maintenance, administration, and downtime—is much higher than it is in the case of proprietary software.The bill would require government to undergo an intensive program of software migration, at considerable immediate cost and risk. And because multiple versions of open-source software exist, the bill’s measures are likely to increase compatibility problems between the information-technology systems of government agencies, as well as between government systems and private-sector systems.
We are aware that open-source software is not always offered free of charge. And although savings are indeed mentioned in the bill, its primary aim is to protect citizens’ free access to information. Because the bill requires that encoding of data not be tied to a single software provider, it is able to guarantee this free access.The bill would indeed require government to begin an intensive process of software migration that would not otherwise be undertaken. However, the high cost of software migration in general is an argument in favor of the bill. The longer a particular information technology system is used, the more expensive migration to a different system becomes. Because open-source software allows the encoding of data in standard and adaptable formats, software migration becomes much easier and less expensive once open-source software is installed. And of course, migration from proprietary to open-source software would entail no greater cost than would migration between two different proprietary software systems.

For each of the following statements, select Undermines if it would, if true, undermine the arguments made in one or the other of the two passages. Otherwise, select Does not undermine.
Undermines Does not undermine
Migration from proprietary software to open-source software would be significantly more expensive for the government than would migration from proprietary software to other proprietary software.
The measures included in the bill will, if complied with,ensure compatibility among software systems used by all the various relevant stakeholders.
As a software package is used for a longer period of time,it becomes less expensive to migrate from that package to another.
正确答案: 1,1,1

参考解析

提交我的解析
    知识点概述
    本题主要涉及逻辑推理中的削弱论证知识点,判断给定陈述是否能对文中关于政府使用开源软件议案相关论点起到削弱作用。 解析
    - 陈述一:从专有软件迁移到开源软件对政府来说比迁移到其他专有软件成本显著更高。这加强了文中提到的政府软件迁移成本高的观点,并非削弱,所以选Does not undermine。 - 陈述二:议案中的措施若得到遵守将确保各相关利益者使用的软件系统之间的兼容性。这直接反驳了原文中“议案措施可能增加兼容性问题”的论点,起到削弱作用,选Undermines。 - 陈述三:软件包使用时间越长,从该软件包迁移到另一个软件包的成本就越低。但文中未提及软件使用时长与迁移成本的关系,与原文论点无关,选Does not undermine。

题目讨论 (如果对题目有任何的疑惑,欢迎在这里提出来,大家会帮你解答的哦~)

还没有人评论,赶快抢个沙发~

报告题目错误 ×
请选择错误类型:
请描述一下这个错误:

取消
logo

mofa留学圈
一站式GMAT与GRE在线学习平台

公众号

关注mofa留学圈